Regardless of what developers use, a QA test must be performed with what your end users are using (stable branch). Granted on the Stable side of the equation, bugs still make their way through however, these bugs are quicker to be patched than lower channels (beta, and dev). What is the risk that perhaps my browser won't be a victim of a client side attack, and allow an attacker to get access to my connections/bank account information and so on. If you're just talking about using something at home/hobbyist, you still should ask yourself what is the risk of someone finding a bug in a beta. In production environments, betas are a no no, and are often contained on dev machines that are likely not connected to anything mission critical. #Is it safe to enable webgl in chrome fullWhat you can note are two things: Stable Channel " full testing to avoid crashes" versus Beta Channel: "minimal risk" and Dev Channel: "While this build does get tested, it is still subject to bugs" so you need to ask yourself: "Where is this beta going to be. While this build does get tested, it is still subject to bugs,Īs we want people to see what's new as soon as possible. The Dev channel gets updated once or twice More than a month before the Stable channel will get them.ĭev channel: If you want to see the latest Chrome OS features, then Updated roughly every week, with major updates coming every 6 weeks, Updated roughly every 2-3 weeks for minor changes, and every 6 weeksīeta channel: If you are interested in seeing upcoming features andĮnhancements with minimal risk, Beta channel is the place to be. Test team, and is the best bet to avoid crashes and other issues. Stable channel: This channel has the full testing of the Chrome OS To illustrate this, here is Chrome's explanation documenting the differences Some of these features haven't gone through the rigorous testing as a stable (Release) version. Typically developer versions (called beta editions in the Software Lifecyle) are used to showcase upcoming features. # Configure KarmaĬreate a file that uses the ChromeHeadless launcher. I'm using Mocha and Chai in this post, but if you're not a fan, choose your favorite assertion library that works in the browser. Or use npm: npm i -save-dev karma karma-chrome-launcher karma-mocha karma-chai #Is it safe to enable webgl in chrome installInstall Karma, the relevant, plugins, and the test runners using yarn: yarn add -dev karma karma-chrome-launcher karma-mocha karma-chai #Is it safe to enable webgl in chrome full versionHeadless Chrome gives you a real browser context without the memory overhead of running a full version of Chrome. One of the benefits of using Headless Chrome (as opposed to testing directly in Node) is that your JavaScript tests will be executed in the same environment as users of your site. Headless Chrome is a way to run the Chrome browser in a headless environment without the full browser UI. Karma is a testing harness that works with any of the most popular testing frameworks ( Jasmine, Mocha, QUnit).Ĭhai is an assertion library that works with Node and in the browser. Karma, Mocha, Chai, Headless Chrome, oh my! If you want to run automated tests using Headless Chrome, look no further! This article will get you all set up using Karma as a runner and Mocha+Chai for authoring tests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |